Finally, someone is using social media to reform the failed business model of a beloved membership organization, the National Geogrphic Society.
Alan Mairson, free-lance journalist and former staffer at NGS, is on a crusade to save National Geographic and, in turn, journalism. Blogging at SocietyMatters.org, Mairson offers up solid reporting and is attracting a crowd to work on the problem.
Last night, I attended the second IgniteDC event as the guest of that perennial cool chick, Rhea Blanken. It was an opportunity to experience a digital crowd in human form, giving a platform and five minutes to people with a passion. In Round Two, Mairson did his five minutes and brought the place to life.
Stories from his time at National Geographic made his point, reinforcing his credibility as a writer who worked inside that golden yellow box of images for twenty years. One story was of a failed membership campaign, appealing to subscribers to "Join the Adventure." Mairson's point? By promising armchair adventure as it had for 100 years, NGS failed to engage potential members in their own adventure.
No doubt the magazine is in trouble--all are--and those who love the magazine want to save it. But when I think of National Geographic, it's no longer the magazine that comes to mind. I think of exploration and our planet, their fabulous exhibits in Washington and maniacal love of photography and perfection. I think of the one time NGS involved me in their work--I sent my DNA in to the ongoing "genographic" project tracing our shared humanity.
I haven't looked at the magazine in years--Smithsonian magazine filled that gap--but is the National Geographic just a magazine? And is a magazine journalism?





